" /> Internet and IP Law Roundup: November 2006 Archives

« October 2006 | Main | December 2006 »

November 22, 2006

Thanksgiving for New DMCA Exceptions

Thanksgiving for New DMCA Exceptions:


Exciting and surprising good news from the world of copyright law: the Librarian of Congress has approved an exception to the anti-circumvention rules of the DMCA that prevented film and media studies professors from copying clips of DVDs for use in class. This legal obstacle to an educational use of digital content was one of the case studies at the center of our Digital Learning white paper released this summer by the Berkman Center. The final rule is here, and this page has links to more details.


The problem was a serious one for film professors. A provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Law (or DMCA) prohibited the “circumvention” of “access controls” placed on digital media — including the CSS encryption used in just about all commercially distributed DVDs. A film professor who wanted to show three clips from three movies that exemplified, say, a particular cinematographic convention, had to break that encryption to make the “clip reel” (or else waste half the class period navigating scene selection menus to get to the relevant part). Until this ruling, breaking the encryption meant breaking the law — and while many (perhaps most) film professors did so anyway, they were taking a risk. Their dilemma illustrated the ridiculous over-inclusiveness of the DMCA, since the actual use of the film clips in class was unquestionably legal.


The new exception is one of six — count ‘em, six — granted in the three-year review undertaken as part of the DMCA by the Librarian of Congress (who oversees the Copyright Office). Others include:



  • renewal of a provision meant to help blind readers (who often confront difficulty with DRM) circumvent access controls that prevent conversion of e-books to reading machines;

  • a new provision allowing security research on CDs with DRM that would harm computers, such as the infamous Sony root kit; and

  • a new provision allowing circumvention of access controls in cell phone handsets that can prevent use of the phone on other wireless carriers (including using your GSM phone in Europe — sort of defeats the purpose of GSM if you are “locked in” by your domestic carrier…).


I must say I am pleasantly surprised. The DMCA calls for such a rulemaking proceeding by the Librarian once every three years, but the two previous ones since the law passed have been disappointing. These rules are still quite narrow, but after all, the DMCA only authorizes exceptions that correct for situations where DRM prevents noninfringing uses of content. Advocates such as EFF, Peter Jaszi and the crew at the American University IP clinic, and Jennifer Granick and the Stanford Cyberlaw Clinic, among others, all deserve credit for commenting in a situation where they might have appeared to be tilting at windmills — their efforts have been rewarded.


Nice to enter the holiday giving thanks for, of all things, a DMCA rule!



November 21, 2006

Fourth Circuit Gives Boost to Spammers

Fourth Circuit Gives Boost to Spammers:


An recent decision by the Fourth Circuit held that a federal anti-spamming law protects spammers by shielding them against state anti-spam laws. The federal CAN-SPAM Act, which provides remedies against some spammers, contains a provision that preempts state anti-spam laws,...

43(B)log: New federal dilution law applied in "dog of a case"

43(B)log: New federal dilution law applied in "dog of a case":


Friday, November 10, 2006
New federal dilution law applied in "dog of a case"
Beginning the opinion with a barrage of puns, a federal district court has engaged in the first interpretation of the FTDA as amended. Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Haute Diggity Dog, LLC, 2006 WL 3182468 (E.D. Va. 2006). Defendant sells, inter alia, dog beds and toys with the "Chewy Vuiton" mark and colored interlocking-letters design, an obvious reference to the similar Louis Vuitton mark and trade dress.

Plaintiff's trademark infringement, dilution, and counterfeiting (!) claims failed, as did its copyright infringement claims. Notably, the district court adopted past precedent that parodies are unlikely to cause dilution, even though the new law doesn't include that in its factors for a court to consider. This is not a criticism; the idea that parody is likely to maintain the distinctive image of the parodied mark, so that the usual weight of factors like similarity doesn't apply, has a long pedigree (if I may indulge my own pun) in interpreting state dilution laws that also don't mention parody. In addition, because the parody was "gentle," it was not tarnishing.

Other tidbits: The court found a small overlap in product lines, since Louis Vuitton makes some high end pet products, but it wasn't significant, given that LV's cheapest product was still roughly twice the price of Haute Diggity Dog's most expensive. As one of HDD's customers pointed out, "if I really thought that a $10 dog toy made out of fluff and stuff was an actual Louis Vuitton product, [then] I would be stupid."

The copyright claim reached the right result on fair use, but without any serious analysis of what it is that LV has copyrighted -- the court treated the name "Louis Vuitton" as part of LV's copyright, which it isn't.



November 17, 2006

Judge won't halt AT&T wiretapping lawsuit

Judge won't halt AT&T wiretapping lawsuit:


San Francisco court says lawsuit alleging the carrier illegally allowed the U.S. government to spy on its customers can continue.

SEC Filings Now Searchable Online

SEC Filings Now Searchable Online:


The SEC announced that people may now search the contents of SEC filings, including company disclosures, with a new search tool on the agency's Web site. The tool allows users to enter a keyword or other search query to retrieve a list of related SEC filings going back four years.

Wireless Security Sells

Wireless Security Sells:


When it comes to WiFi security, there are greater worries than thwarting wireless intruders and tracking PDAs. Provisions in Sarbanes-Oxley and other acts require that companies protect sensitive data. Small wonder tech outfits that help secure WiFi are drawing capital.

November 02, 2006

JPEG Patent Claim Surrendered! - From GrokLaw

JPEG Patent Claim Surrendered!:


Here you go, straight from the Public Patent Foundation's press release: Forgent Networks has stopped asserting its patent against JPEG, has dropped all its pending cases that were
asserting the patent, and says that it won't file any other infringement claims based on the patent. You'll recall that PubPat challenged the patent last year and the USPTO reexamination led to rejection of the broadest claims.

On its website page on the Forgent Networks JPEG Related Patent, PubPat provides the history:

PUBPAT filed a formal request with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in November 2005 to revoke the patent Forgent Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: FORG) is widely asserting against the Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) international standard for the electronic sharing of photo-quality images. In its filing, PUBPAT submitted previously unseen prior art showing that the patent, which was issued in 1987 to Forgent's subsidiary Compression Labs Inc., was not new and, as such, should be revoked. The PTO granted PUBPAT's request in February 2006 and rejected the broadest claims of the patent in May 2006. In November 2006, Forgent abandoned all assertion of the patent.

You can get the legal filing and the USPTO orders from that page. Hey, sometimes there's good news. Not all the news stories can be about somebody's corporate strategy to steal Red Hat's customers.